Menilai Bayi dengan Cedera Otak Traumatik

Oleh :

Sunita

Penilaian risiko cedera otak traumatik pada bayi yang mengalami trauma kepala masih menjadi tantangan karena bayi sering kali tidak menunjukkan tanda dan gejala yang spesifik. Hal ini berpotensi menyebabkan misdiagnosis, keterlambatan tata laksana, dan penggunaan modalitas pencitraan yang berlebih.

Pemeriksaan radiologi berupa computed tomography (CT) scan dapat dipertimbangkan pada pasien dengan cedera otak traumatik risiko tinggi. Namun, ada kekhawatiran mengenai paparan radiasi pengion dari CT scan terhadap bayi, sehingga beragam metode prediksi lain telah dikembangkan. Artikel ini akan membahas metode penilaian risiko cedera otak traumatik pada bayi dan aplikasinya dalam praktik klinis.[1-3]

Tanda dan Gejala Cedera Otak Traumatik pada Bayi

(Konten ini khusus untuk dokter. Registrasi untuk baca selengkapnya)

Referensi

1. Lerner JT, Giza CC. Traumatic Brain Injury In Children. Swaiman’s Pediatric Neurology: Principles and Practice: Sixth Edition. Elsevier Inc.; 2017. 781–793 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-37101-8.00102-8
2. Almeida AA, Lorincz MT, Hashikawa AN. Recent Advances In Pediatric Concussion And Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018;65(6):1151–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2018.07.006
3. Abid Z, Kuppermann N, Tancredi DJ, et al. Risk Of Traumatic Brain Injuries In Infants Younger Than 3 Months With Minor Blunt Head Trauma. Ann Emerg Med. 2021;78(3):321-330.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.04.015
4. Yi W, Liu R, Chen J, et al. Trauma Infant Neurologic Score Predicts The Outcome Of Traumatic Brain Injury In Infants. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010;46(4):259–66.
5. Khalifa M, Gallego B. Grading And Assessment Of Clinical Predictive Tools For Paediatric Head Injury: A New Evidence-Based Approach. BMC Emerg Med. 2019;19(1):1–12.
6. Babl FE, Borland ML, Phillips N, et al. Accuracy Of PECARN, CATCH, And CHALICE Head Injury Decision Rules In Children: A Prospective Cohort Study. Lancet (London, England). 2017;389(10087):2393–402. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28410792
7. Easter JS, Bakes K, Dhaliwal J, et al. Comparison Of PECARN, CATCH, And CHALICE Rules For Children With Minor Head Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(2):145–52, 152.e1-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24635987
8. Khalifa M, Magrabi F, Gallego LB. Evaluating The Impact Of The Grading And Assessment Of Predictive Tools Framework On Clinicians And Health Care Professionals’ Decisions In Selecting Clinical Predictive Tools: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(7):e15770. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32673228
9. Atabaki SM, Jacobs BR, Brown KM, et al. Quality Improvement In Pediatric Head Trauma With PECARN Rules Implementation As Computerized Decision Support. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2017;2(3):e019. https://journals.lww.com/01949578-201705000-00002
10. Bressan S, Romanato S, Mion T, et al. Implementation Of Adapted PECARN Decision Rule For Children With Minor Head Injury In The Pediatric Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2012;19(7):801–7. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2012.01384.x
11. Kuppermann N, Holmes JF, Dayan PS, et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1160-70. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61558-0.